Das Projekt "Ökologie des Wildschweins Sus scrofa in der Nähe von Schutzgebieten" wird vom Umweltbundesamt gefördert und von Universität Freiburg, Forstzoologisches Institut, Professur für Wildtierökologie und Wildtiermanagement durchgeführt. In strict nature reserves and core zones of protected areas hunting and forestry operations are often restricted or banned. However, regarding the management of Wild boar, such hunt-free zones are discussed controversially and can lead to conflict. Hunters whose areas border no-hunting zones (and who have to reimburse farmers for crop damages caused by Wild boar) are concerned that the boars may evade effective population management by staying within the limits of the no-hunting zone, and farmers fear increased crop damage in the surroundings of such areas. Some conservationists are also concerned because Wild boars increasingly root protected habitats and can cause damage to rare plant assemblies. The three-year project Wild boar problem in the vicinity of protected areas by the Game Research Institute (Wildforschungsstelle) at the Centre for Agriculture Baden-Württemberg (LAZBW) aims at investigating if and how no-hunting zones might affect Wild boar activity, movement patterns, home range size, and habitat use, as well as crop damage caused by boars, by comparing these aspects between hunting-free zones and unprotected areas. Although there have already been a number of telemetry studies on Wild boar, including space use in the context of hunting activity, to date there is no study that has specifically investigated spatial and ecological aspects in and around protected areas. My dissertation Ecology of Wild boar Sus scrofa in the vicinity of protected areas is being carried out within the scope of the Game Research Institutes project and apart from the aims outlined above, further aspects of Wild boar ecology will be investigated, especially the role of Wild boar as bio-engineer and habitat creator for other species vs. unwanted damages at protected sites. Twenty-seven Vectronic GPS-GSM satellite collars with integrated activity sensors are available to tag Wild boars in three study areas: the non-protected Altdorfer Forest near Aulendorf with regular hunting activity and forestry, the nature reserve Wurzacher Ried with its ca. 700 ha core zone that is a strict reserve with no human activity, and the Biosphere Reserve Swabian Jura, especially in the surroundings of the former military training area near Münsingen and the 170 ha no-usage-area Föhrenberg.
Das Projekt "Analysis and Harmonisation (PROFOR)": Mitarbeit in den Arbeitsgruppen 1 und 3 sowie Koordination zweier Unterarbeitsgruppen zur Geschichte von Waldschutzgebieten und zum Konzept der Naturnähe" wird vom Umweltbundesamt gefördert und von Universität Göttingen, Burckhardt-Institut, Professur für Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege durchgeführt. In 2002 the COST Action E27 'Protected Forest Areas in Europe - Analysis and Harmonisation' was launched to provide a better understanding of national and international distinctions of Protected Forest Areas (PFAs). With the aim to analyse and harmonise the wide range of PFA categories used in European countries within the context of existing international systems of Protected Areas, until 2006 about 100 researchers and experts from multiple disciplines, representing 25 European countries (see figure below), worked together in three Working Groups, organised as follows: WG 1 'Description and analysis of Protected Forest Areas - national dimension', WG 2 'Harmonisation and improvement of information on European Protected Forest Areas - international dimension', WG 3 'A clearing house mechanism for European Protected Forest Areas'.Working Group 1, in which R. Bürger-Arndt and J. Welzholz represented Germany, described the different sorts of PFAs that exist in the COST Action E27 countries, reviewed their current state and historical development and provided an understanding of what the differences are between them and why. The information gathered in this process was used for a thorough description and analysis of PFAs in Europe, helped Working Group 2 to formulate recommendations for the enhancement of the quality and clarity of information on PFAs at the European level and is intended to be a source of information for scientists, foresters, policy makers and conservationists at the national and international level.The achievements of Working Group 1 were mainly made available by two project publications and two project homepages. The country reports (LATHAM et al. 2005) supply a detailed description of national Protected Area types with their historical and socio-economic background, including information on the historical development of PFAs, responsible organisations, selection criteria and representativity, inventories and monitoring and wider landscape issues. In conjunction with the elaboration of the PFA country reports, national PFA tables were compiled. They contain summary statistics on area, size, ownership, motivations for protection and management restrictions. Summarising and comparing synthesis reports on the examined issues are part of the final report of the COST Action E27 (FRANK et al. 2007). Two homepages built up by Working Group 3 provide several documents and interactive databases on PFAs produced in the course of the COST Action E27.